home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Illusion - Is Seeing Really Believing?
/
Illusion - Is Seeing Really Believing (1998)(Marshall Media)[Mac-PC].iso
/
pc
/
illusion
/
rock_fie.cxt
/
00200_Field_200.txt
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1996-12-31
|
2KB
|
57 lines
There has been much in
artistic representation that is
conventional. Spectators have
tended either to be unaware of
these conventions or not to
realize that there might be
other methods of
representation. The ancient
Egyptians perhaps did not
realize that their mode of
representing the human figure
--part frontal view, part profile
view--was a matter of
convention and only one of
many possible ways to
represent it. The early Greeks
(circa 600 B.C.) probably did not
recognize their way of
rendering the human figure in
paintings and statues as a
convention but thought of it as
the only true way to do so. It is
possible that pre-Renaissance
painters and some later
painters did not realize that
their paintings of infant faces
were simply smaller likenesses
of adult faces and that this was
a matter of convention. Yet one
would also think that in such
cases both artists and
spectators would have realized
that the painting differed from
the object painted in certain
respects and that this
realization would have given
rise to a vague feeling of
dissatisfaction with the
painting. In contemporary art,
an example of convention is
the use of streaks behind
figures in cartoons to convey
an impression of rapid motion,
a convention that likely arose
from looking at photographs of
rapidly moving objects. Another
example, found in some
cartoons and drawings, is the
use of lines to indicate color
differences, such as the use of
outline to indicate a giraffeΓÇÖs
colored spots. John M. Kennedy
of the University of Toronto
reports that members of New
GuineaΓÇÖs Songe tribe do not
understand this usage.